Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Reyman
Indiana Supreme Court
From Orange Circuit Court, Thomas B. Bushirh, Judge. Action by Joseph E. Reyman against the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.
1Opinion of the CourtGillett, C. J.
—This action was commenced in the Washington Circuit Court, and was sent on change of venue to the court below. There was a trial by the court, which resulted in a finding and judgment for appellee.
1. Appellee’s counsel contend that the case must be affirmed for the assigned reason that the two paragraphs of complaint set out in the transcript are not in the record; citing Consolidated Stone Co. v. Staggs (1905), 164 Ind. 331. The basis of the objection to the record lies in the fact that said paragraphs were not copied into the record by the clerk of the court below, as they should have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perry, Matthews-Buskirk Stone Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Gregg v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Consolidated Stone Co. v. StaggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NashIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bright National Bank v. HartmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Gwinn v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KnoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- American Railway Express Co. v. RhodyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. StoufferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916