Legal Opinion
STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. Shein
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 11, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
283 N.J. Super. 588 (1995)
662 A.2d 1020
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT J. SHEIN, MINDA SHEIN, MICHAEL SENOFF AND JANE SENOFF, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY; JACK BORRUS; ESHAM CORP., A DEFUNCT CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY; TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWICK, IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 3, 1995.
Decided August 11, 1995.
Before KING,[1] D'ANNUNZIO and EICHEN, JJ.
George P. Ljutich argued the cause for appellant (Deborah T.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SilverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CaoiliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- City of Elko v. ZillichNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- San Diego County Water Authority v. MireiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- NJ Turnpike Authority v. O'NEILLNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Housing Authority v. Suydam Investors, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Calaway v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- City of Black Hawk v. FickeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Housing Auth. of City of New Brunswick v. Suydam Investors, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.