Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Vilensky
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 19, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louis D. Laurino, S.
This is a proceeding by the attorney in fact for alleged distributees of decedent, all of whom reside in the U. S. S. R, to . withdraw funds deposited with the Finance Administrator by order of this court pursuant to SCPA 2222.
The petitioner moves to take the testimony of one of the alleged distributees and of a nonparty witness by means of letters rogatory addressed to an appropriate court or tribunal in the U. S. S. R. Both of these individuals reside in Moscow.
The Attorney-General, who appears for the comptroller and the people of New York, opposes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gray v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Decauville Automobile Co. v. Metropolitan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- U. S. Neckwear Corp. v. Sinaco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
- Bowen v. Havana Electric Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Ecco High Frequency Corp. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the District AttorneyNew York Supreme Court · 1986