Legal Opinion
Ecco High Frequency Corp. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorcoran, J.
The motion of the defendant to examine plaintiff before trial is granted as to items 1, 2 and 3. The examination shall proceed at Special Term, Part II on September 26, 1949, at 10:30 a.m., at which time and place all pertinent records shall be produced for use pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act.
The motion of the defendant for a discovery and inspection is granted. The time and place of the discovery and inspection shall be fixed in the order, the settlement of which is hereby directed. The defendant shall bear the expenses in connection with the discovery and inspection, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- U. S. Neckwear Corp. v. Sinaco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
- Sohonten v. France & Canada Steamship Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- In re the Accounting of EckertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of VilenskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979
- Tomaka v. Pennsylvania RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Ecco High Frequency Corp. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949