Legal Opinion

Franklin Paint Co. v. Flaherty

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 2, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover on account of an alleged sale of thirty gallons of roofing paint. The writ contains two counts in assumpsit, one an account annexed and the other a special count for nonacceptance. The presiding Justice heard and decided the “cause without the aid of the jury,” the parties agreeing thereto. R. S. 1930, Chap. 91, Sec. 26. His decision was for the defendant. The case comes up on the plaintiff’s bill of exceptions, corrected under Chap. 86, P. L. 1941.

Clearly the action is not maintainable on the first count, for “To maintain an action for the price, actual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hollis v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  2. Andrews v. Dirigo Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  3. Homer N. Chase & Co. v. DoyleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fullerton Union High School District v. RilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Maine Mutual Fire Insurance v. WatsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  3. H.D. Goodall Hospital v. Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Schiavi Mobile Homes, Inc. v. GagneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. HD Goodall Hosp. v. DHHSSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API