Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1929No. File No. 6722PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'CAMPBELL, J-

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and has appealed.

Appellant predicates error upon a separation of the jury after submission of the cause and 'before agreement. The case was submitted! to the jury about noon on June 15th, and the verdict was returned into court on June 16th. The showing with reference to the matter of separation is by affidavits, and is substantially as follows:

One Dorman makes affidavit thát about 6 o’clock in the evening of June 15th he, in company with defendant, was standing on a street corner in the town of Kennebec, where the cause was…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. TalleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Baker v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  3. State v. SinnottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. WolfeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. FaughtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API