Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1992No. C8-92-222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant challenges the sentencing court’s revocation of probation, claiming the sentencing court abused its discretion where appellant did not intentionally violate any conditions of probation. We disagree and affirm on this issue. He also claims his conviction for first degree sale of crack cocaine must be reduced because the statute under which he was convicted has been declared void. We agree and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

Appellant pleaded guilty to one count of first degree controlled substance crime and one count of second degree controlled substance crime in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. FritscheCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. In Re the Welfare of D.T.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. In Re the Welfare of D.T.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API