State v. Fritsche
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This appeal questions whether the trial court properly revoked its stay of imposition of a sentence and, if so, whether its subsequent stay of an executed sentence could extend the term of court authority over appellant beyond the statutory five-year maximum sentence for his offense. We reverse on both questions.
FACTS
In March 1981, appellant violated the state statute on aggravated criminal property damage (over $300), Minn.Stat. § 609.-595, subd. 1(3) (1980). The statute permitted a sentence of imprisonment for not more than five years.
Appellant pleaded guilty when…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BelfryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988