Legal Opinion

State v. Fritsche

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 1987No. C4-86-2153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This appeal questions whether the trial court properly revoked its stay of imposition of a sentence and, if so, whether its subsequent stay of an executed sentence could extend the term of court authority over appellant beyond the statutory five-year maximum sentence for his offense. We reverse on both questions.

FACTS

In March 1981, appellant violated the state statute on aggravated criminal property damage (over $300), Minn.Stat. § 609.-595, subd. 1(3) (1980). The statute permitted a sentence of imprisonment for not more than five years.

Appellant pleaded guilty when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BelfryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API