Legal Opinion
United States v. Triumph Capital Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 4, 2002No. Crim. No. 3:00CR217(EBB)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS
NEVAS, District Judge.
Three of the five defendants charged in the superseding indictment in this public corruption case moved to suppress1 all of the evidence obtained through a search and seizure of a Compaq Pentium laptop computer that was owned by the defendant, Triumph Capital Group, Inc. (“Triumph”) and used exclusively by Triumph’s Vice President and General Counsel, defendant Charles B. Spa-doni (“Spadoni”).2 Defendant Frederick W. McCarthy (“McCarthy”), Triumph’s CEO and controlling shareholder, asserts a proprietary interest in the laptop computer and…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Donald SyphersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Com. v. Bowens, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- State v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- In Re Appeal of Application for Search WarrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.