Legal Opinion

Board of Park Commrs. v. Budget Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1970No. Nos. 69-543, 69-556, 69-557, 69-568, 69-569, 69-570 and 69-572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The Board of Tax Appeals considers appeals from a county budget commission’s allocation of the local government fund de novo as if it were the budget commission. Brooklyn v. Cuyahoga County Budget Comm., 2 Ohio St. 2d 181, paragraph two of syllabus. Our jurisdiction is limited to deciding whether the board’s decision was unreasonable or unlawful. R. C. 5717.04; Youngstown Club v. Porterfield, 21 Ohio St. 2d 83, and cases cited therein, at page 85.

The cities of Youngstown and Struthers urge the reasonableness of the board’s conclusion that electoral ap^ proval of an increased income tax (from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Youngstown Club v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Village of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of New Boston v. Scioto County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. City of Painesville v. Board of County Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Village of Waterville v. Spencer TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Board of Park Commissioners v. Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API