Village of Waterville v. Spencer Township
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Prior to determining the substantive issues presented by each appellant, two motions to dismiss the appeals must be considered. The first, in case No. 73-693, was filed by Sylvania Township, one of 11 appellees listed in the caption of the notice of appeal filed by the village of Waterville in case No. 73-693. The basis of this motion is an allegation, supported by two affidavits, that appellant, village of Waterville, failed to serve the township with a notice of appeal, as expressly required by R. C. 5717.04 and Section 6, Rule I of this court’s Rules of Practice. Appellant’s “Proof of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zier v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Curran v. BrookesOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Board of County Commissioners v. Village of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Brook Park v. Cuyahoga County Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Toledo v. Lucas County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Columbus v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Mason City School District Board of Education v. Warren County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Heath v. Teich, 06ap-1018 (5-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- City of Canton v. Stark County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- City Commission of City of Springfield v. Bethel TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.