Legal Opinion

Village of Waterville v. Spencer Township

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1974No. Nos. 73-693 and 73-697PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Prior to determining the substantive issues presented by each appellant, two motions to dismiss the appeals must be considered. The first, in case No. 73-693, was filed by Sylvania Township, one of 11 appellees listed in the caption of the notice of appeal filed by the village of Waterville in case No. 73-693. The basis of this motion is an allegation, supported by two affidavits, that appellant, village of Waterville, failed to serve the township with a notice of appeal, as expressly required by R. C. 5717.04 and Section 6, Rule I of this court’s Rules of Practice. Appellant’s “Proof of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zier v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Curran v. BrookesOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Village of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. City of Brook Park v. Cuyahoga County Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. City of Toledo v. Lucas County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mason City School District Board of Education v. Warren County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Heath v. Teich, 06ap-1018 (5-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. City of Canton v. Stark County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. City Commission of City of Springfield v. Bethel TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API