Legal Opinion
James v. Conceptus, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 12, 2012No. Civil Action No. H-11-1183PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1024MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
This is a whistleblower-retaliation action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h). The plaintiff, Toby James, worked in Texas as a sales representative for Conceptus, Inc., a medical-device firm. James alleges that Conceptus fired him after he questioned the legality of how a sales representative had marketed Conceptus medical devices to physicians and how those physicians had billed Medicaid for them. After James sued in this court, (Docket Entry No. 1), Conceptus moved to compel arbitration under James’s employment agreement and…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holsapple v. Doggett Equipment Services, LtdDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021