Legal Opinion

United States v. Conklin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 18, 1928No. 5412PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

George Heizman enlisted in the United States Army May 5, 1918, and on the following day applied for war risk insurance in the sum of $10,000. July 16, 1918, his wife, Sadie Mae Heizman, was designated as beneficiary under the policy. The premium due November 1,1919, was not paid, and the policy lapsed one month later. October 7, 1920, the Heizmans were divorced by decree of the district court of Montgomery county, Kansas, at the suit of the wife, and on November 2, 1920, George Heizman died. The government states in its brief that the insurance lapsed and was not in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Heath v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. FinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Cassarello v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murray v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
  2. United States v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  3. Magruder v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1929
  4. United States v. GarrisonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API