Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1930No. 6186PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, District Judge.

The appellee, plaintiff below, brought action to recover so-called “automatic” insurance under the War Risk Insurance Act (40 Stat. 398). From a verdict and judgment in his favor the government has appealed. In his complaint the plaintiff alleges, in substance : That on or about June 24, 1916, he enlisted in the National Guard of the State of Washington, and remained continuously therein until that organization was called into the service of the federal government by the President; that on April 28, 1917, and while engaged in the active service of the United States, he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Brandaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. Schroeder v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1928
  5. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Third Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  3. Du Vall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Madeline Wilkinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API