Legal Opinion

Biller v. Director, Patuxent Institution

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 8, 1974No. 194, September Term, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The interesting question posed by this appeal is whether a judge must be present when a jury renders its verdict in a civil case. The appellant, Robert Lee Biller, strenuously argues that the judge’s failure to be present in such a case, unless the parties have consented to his absence, constitutes reversible error. We agree with appellant, reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County and remand the matter for a new trial. We now give our reasons.

Appellant pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County to a criminal information charging him with arson. He was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Sas v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
  5. Austin v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sonner v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Lykins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Lykins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API