Biller v. Director, Patuxent Institution
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The interesting question posed by this appeal is whether a judge must be present when a jury renders its verdict in a civil case. The appellant, Robert Lee Biller, strenuously argues that the judge’s failure to be present in such a case, unless the parties have consented to his absence, constitutes reversible error. We agree with appellant, reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County and remand the matter for a new trial. We now give our reasons.
Appellant pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County to a criminal information charging him with arson. He was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Sas v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
- Austin v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sonner v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Lykins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Lykins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980