Legal Opinion

Kolehouse v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1954PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The principal issue on this appeal is whether the holder of a conditional sales contract covering a motor vehicle has any rights to the proceeds of a policy of collision insurance payable as the result of a collision sustained by the vehicle, where, after the collision occurred, such holder improperly foreclosed the conditional sales contract against the vehicle.

The failure of Universal C. I. T., the holder of the conditional sales contract, to comply with the provisions of sec. 122.19, Stats., in holding a sale of the damaged tractor on March 14, 1950, rendered such sale void, and Universal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Harrington v. Fitchburg Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Gattavara v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barrett v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Nolden v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Little Rock Road Machinery v. LightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. Rock County Savings & Trust Co. v. London Assurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Snyder v. GuiderNew York Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API