Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cleary

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 28, 1996No. 95-P-132PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

An indictment (no. 93-004) charged the defendant, James K. Cleary, with a violation of the mayhem statute, G. L. c. 265, § 14. The statute1 provides:

*215“[1] Whoever, with malicious intent to maim or disfigure . . . puts out or destroys an eye , ... or [2] whoever, with intent to maim or disfigure, assaults another person with a dangerous weapon . . . and by such assault disfigures, cripples or inflicts serious or permanent physical injury upon such person . . . shall be punished ”2

At trial to a Franklin County jury, the government presented the following basic scenario through its witnesses. On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. St. PierreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. McCanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FergusonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. Ogden O.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. Hap LayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. ForbesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API