Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Cleary
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 28, 1996No. 95-P-132PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
An indictment (no. 93-004) charged the defendant, James K. Cleary, with a violation of the mayhem statute, G. L. c. 265, § 14. The statute1 provides:
*215“[1] Whoever, with malicious intent to maim or disfigure . . . puts out or destroys an eye , ... or [2] whoever, with intent to maim or disfigure, assaults another person with a dangerous weapon . . . and by such assault disfigures, cripples or inflicts serious or permanent physical injury upon such person . . . shall be punished ”2
At trial to a Franklin County jury, the government presented the following basic scenario through its witnesses. On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. St. PierreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. McCanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FergusonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. Ogden O.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. Hap LayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ForbesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.