Pribbeno v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Richardson county: John B. Raper, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Root, C.
The Nemaha river flows in a general southeasterly direction through Richardson county. The railroad company’s railway is constructed across the valley of said river in an east and west course, crossing the river about a mile and a half east of the village of Preston. Above this crossing the river describes an irregular open loop, its path up-stream from that point being nearly north by west, thence west, and thence southwest. Just at the *658crossing of the railway the river approaches the foothills on the north side of the valley. The railway is constructed on a grade some eight to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HennesseyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Hopper v. Elkhorn Valley Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Wynnewood v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Frickel v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Tankersley v. Lincoln Traction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.