Legal Opinion

ProMove, Inc. v. Siepman

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 18, 2019No. Case No. 18-cv-1196 (WMW/KMM)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs ProMove, Inc., and Logisys, Inc. (collectively, Plaintiffs), brought this action against ProMove's former employees Mark Siepman and Joseph Hammerslough (the individual defendants) as well as Sunset Transportation LV, Inc., and Tantara Transportation Group (the corporate defendants), asserting multiple claims, including breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, and misappropriation of trade secrets. Defendants collectively move to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, alternatively, to transfer this case to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andersen Corporation and Eagle Window & Door Manufacturing, Inc. v. ATS Ohio, Inc. and ATS CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
  2. Corval Constructors, Inc. v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  3. Courtelis v. RosenbergDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
  4. Courtelis v. RosenbergDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  5. H2I Group, Inc. v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API