In re the Detention of Moore
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶1 Paul Moore was civilly committed as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under chapter 71.09 RCW. On review, he argues that the trial court erred in accepting his stipulation to certain facts without conducting an inquiry into Moore’s competency, that trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for agreeing to a stipulation, and that the State was required to prove Moore would reoffend within the foreseeable future to establish he is currently dangerous. We reject Moore’s arguments and affirm.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Prior sexual and criminal history
¶2 In 1985, Moore…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- McGee v. BartowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Grado v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- State v. WEAVILLECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- In re the Personal Restraint of MeirhoferWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re BraddySupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.