State v. WEAVILLE
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, C.J.
¶1 Penetration, an element of rape in the second degree, is not defined within chapter 9A.44 RCW. Nevertheless, mere contact between the sex organs of two individuals does not constitute penetration. A jury instruction defining “penetration” in this manner is erroneous. Here, the supplemental instruction given to the jury contained such an incorrect statement of the law. Accordingly, we reverse Scott Weaville’s conviction of rape in the second degree. We affirm his remaining convictions.
I
¶2 On August 12, 2009, Weaville and his roommate, Thomas Wilson, purchased three “mollies,” which are a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sarah Gosney, Res/cross-apps. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., Apps/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Earl Ray PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Alan D. JenksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State of Washington v. Gary Bruce FarnworthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Madelynn M. Tapken v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.