Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Costello

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

HIOKMAN, O. J.

A joint and several judgment was rendered against appellant and appellee upon a promissory note. Appellant was the maker and ap-pellee the surety on the note, and the judgment provided that appellee should have his execution against appellant for any and all sums he might pay upon the judgment. This judgment became dormant for failure to issue execution thereon within twelve months. The suit from which this appeal is prosecuted was filed by appellee for the purpose of reviving the dormant judgment,.his petition alleging that he had paid the plaintiffs in the original cause.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. State v. National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Edrington v. GeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API