Legal Opinion

State v. National Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1926No. 4540PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge NICKELS

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The National Bank of Cleburne, Johnson County, Texas, was duly selected “County Depository” and qualified as such by execution, etc., of the required bond on April 14, 1921, all in accordance with the terms of Chap. 2, Title 47, R. S. 1925. The penal sum of the bond is $2,208,956, and it is sig-ned by J. W. Floore, Jr., and others, as sureties. O. O. Chrisman, County Judge, is the nominal payee it was duly approved by the Commissioners Court and the Comptroller of Public Accounts and it is of statutory form.

During…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanover National Bank v. MoysesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Hill v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Irvine v. GradyTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Covington Bros. Motor Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. BacheCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Davis v. National Bond & Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Ex Parte LoftinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Edrington v. GeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API