Legal Opinion
United States v. Stone
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 5, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions
John E. Stone and others were indicted for crime.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, District Judge.
Two indictments have been returned against the above-named defendants. They have demurred to each of them. The government says that indictment 354 properly charges a violation of section 19 of the Penal Code (Act March 4, 1909, c. 321, 35 Stat. 1092 [US. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 1396; R. S. § 5508]). That section provides for the punishment of any two or more persons who conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in *838the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution and the laws of the United States or because…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Baldwin v. FranksSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Konovsky. United States v. BraniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- People v. QuesseIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Aczel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
- United States v. AczelDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1915
- Samara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.