Legal Opinion

Bickerstaff v. Cuyahoga County

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 5, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01142Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Brenda V. Bickerstaff, Case No. 1:18cv1142 Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER Magistrate Judge Thomas Parker Cuyahoga County, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Currently pending are Plaintiff Brenda V. Bickerstaff’s Objections (Doc. Nos. 117, 141) to the Orders of Magistrate Judge Thomas Parker dated January 2, 2020 and April 8, 2020, denying her Motion for Leave to File Objections and Motions for Leave to Amend her Complaint and for Sanctions, respectively. For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Richard Perry Curtis,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Sidney Morse v. R. Clayton McWhorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. David M. Jinks and Elizabeth M. Green v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API