Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Perry Curtis,defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 10, 2001No. 98-6680PublishedCited by 557 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel R. Jones, J., joined by Clay, J.,
BATCHELDER, J. (pp. 605-07), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Appellant Richard Perry Curtis (“Curtis”) appeals from a district court order revoking his supervised release. Although we find most of Curtis’s arguments meritless, we REVERSE and REMAND for the district court to use the proper standard in reviewing the magistrate court’s probable cause determination and to give Curtis the opportunity to allo-cute prior to sentencing.
I
A
On January 26, 1995, a federal grand jury sitting in the Western District of Tennessee indicted Curtis for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Hubbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Charles C. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by557 opinions
- Baker v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Ashraf v. Adventist Health Sys./Sunbelt, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Brown v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014
- Myers v. Marietta Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
552 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.