Legal Opinion
Sharma v. Vigil
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 3, 1998No. 97CA1706PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge STERNBERG. *
Defendants, Russell E. and Michele A. Vigil, appearing pro se, appeal from the trial court’s order denying their C.R.C.P. 60(b)(2) motion for relief from a final judgment previously entered against them in favor of plaintiff, N.K. Sharma. We affirm.
Following a trial to the court, a final judgment on the underlying claims was entered on September 23, 1996. Defendants thereafter filed a C.R.C.P. 60(b)(2) motion and supporting affidavits on March 24, 1997, seeking a new trial based on allegations that the adverse judgment had been procured by the fraud and misconduct…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Canton Oil Corp. v. District Court In & For Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Cache Creek Mining TrustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Dunton v. Whitewater West Recreation, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Guevara v. FoxhovenColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Front Range Partners v. Hyland Hills Metropolitan Park & Recreation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re the Marriage of RoddyColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Affordable Country Homes, LLC v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Affordable Country Homes, LLC v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Affordable Country Homes, LLC v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.