Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Templeman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 21, 1929No. 9301PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Appellants make this coneed-edly correct statement:
“Anterior to the 1st day of September, 1928, the City of Navasota, a municipal corporation, and a Home-Rule City within the purview of R. S. Articles 1165 et seq., had filed suit in the district court of Grimes County, Texas, against L. H. Barry, former City Secretary and Tax Collector, and the surety on hisi bond, conditioned for the performance of the duties of his office, to-wit, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, seeking to collect a large sum of money alleged to be due by reason of the failure of Farmers State Guaranty Bank of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bassett v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Rains v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
- Owen v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Monnier v. GodboldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dallas County Flood Control District v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Greenberg v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Dallas County Flood Control District v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.