Legal Opinion

Winsor v. Ludington

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Huron. (Beach, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

The bill in this case is filed to obtain a decree of foreclosure of a certain mortgage made August 10, 1883, for the sum of $500, by Philo Ludington and Hannah, his wife, to Richard Winsor, to be paid in five years from date, Avith interest at 10 per cent., payable annually. The mortgage also contained a clause that in case the interest became due and remained unpaid for 60 days, the Avhole should become due, and foreclosure might he made for the Avhole amount, both principal and interest. The hill was filed July 23, 1886. Defendant Noble Avas made a party to the suit as a subsequent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunkley v. Van BurenNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  2. Vaughan v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. McCrickett v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Culver v. Judge of the Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Kollen v. SooyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  5. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API