Legal Opinion
State v. Schneider
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1986No. Crim. 1143PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Thomas Schneider appealed from the judgment of conviction by the county court of Mercer County for possession of a controlled substance. Schneider argues that the evidence should not have been admitted because it was obtained by an improper search and seizure and that the trial court erred in receiving an uncertified copy of the State Laboratories’ report determining the nature of the substance. We affirm.
On April 30, 1985, Rodney C. Sagen, a Beulah police officer, stopped Schneider for speeding. Sagen asked Schneider to sit in the front passenger’s seat of the police car…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. VetschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Farmers Union Oil Co. of Dickinson v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. PlacekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ransome v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- R & D AMUSEMENT CORP. v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. HuetherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.