Legal Opinion

Ransome v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 14, 2003No. 19, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

The State of Maryland contends that it is permissible for a police officer who observes a man doing nothing more than standing on a sidewalk on a summer night talking with a friend, to stop and frisk that person because (1) they were in a high-crime area, (2) the man had a bulge in his front pants pocket, (3) the man gazed at the unmarked police car containing three plain-clothed officers as it drove by and slowed to a stop, and (4) when the three officers got out of the car, approached the man, identified themselves as police officers, and one began to ask him questions, the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. State v. NievesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Singleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API