Ransome v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
The State of Maryland contends that it is permissible for a police officer who observes a man doing nothing more than standing on a sidewalk on a summer night talking with a friend, to stop and frisk that person because (1) they were in a high-crime area, (2) the man had a bulge in his front pants pocket, (3) the man gazed at the unmarked police car containing three plain-clothed officers as it drove by and slowed to a stop, and (4) when the three officers got out of the car, approached the man, identified themselves as police officers, and one began to ask him questions, the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- State v. NievesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Singleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.