Legal Opinion
David M. Quinn v. Melvin Laird, Etc., Joseph P. Hand v. Melvin Laird, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1970No. 24141_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
On March 7, 1969, appellants Quinn and Hand filed petitions for writs of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California seeking release from the United States Army on the grounds of conscientious objection. The district court, relying on Craycroft v. Ferrall, 408 F.2d 587 (9th Cir. 1969), dismissed the petitions upon the ground that petitioners had not exhausted all military administrative remedies, “namely a petition to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1552, 32 CFR 581.3.” During the pendency of timely…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hammond v. LenfestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Henry v. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Craycroft v. FerrallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Noyd v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alvin G. Smith, and v. Capt. James M. Campbell, Commanding Officer, U. S. Naval Schools Command, Mare Island, Vallejo, California, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Richard D. Glazier v. Capt. James G. Hackel, Company CommanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- William Edwin Rastin, Usn v. Hon. Melvin LairdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Rastin v. LairdDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1970