Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Powers v. Wilkinson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 16, 1987Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAbrams, J.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Hennessey, C.J., and Nolan, J., join). I join in the court’s decision to announce the new rule of construction which defines “issue” to include all biological descendants regardless of the marital status of the parents, overruling the rule of construction of Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Mishou, 321 Mass. 615 (1947). I cannot agree, however, with the court’s determination that the new rule not apply in this case.1 There are two compelling reasons to apply the rule announced in a decision to the litigants involved.

First, by merely announcing the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API