Legal Opinion

Contey v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 20, 1994PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’HERN, J.

This case requires us to consider again the limits of proximate cause and the limits of legal duty as defined by the foreseeability of harm to others. The case arises from an automobile accident in the Borough of Franklin Lakes. Plaintiff, Althea Contey, while driving on an unfamiliar street in the early morning hours, missed an unmarked turn in the road and struck a utility pole. The pole stands approximately ten inches from the curb line at the beginning of an S-curve in the road. To drivers traveling on the roadway, the position of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Caputzal v. Lindsay Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  4. Brown v. United States Stove Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Birchwood Lakes Colony Club, Inc. v. Borough of Medford LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Coates v. Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Seals v. County of MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  4. Bauer v. Harleigh Cemetery Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  5. Seals v. County of MorrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API