Legal Opinion

Caputzal v. Lindsay Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 7, 1966PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hall, J.

This is a products liability case in which the Law Division granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The Appellate Division reversed in an unreported opinion and we granted certification on the defendants’ petition. 46 N. J. 312 (1966).

The claim is a bizarre one. The evidence before the trial court on the motion derived from plaintiff’s own testimony in a deposition taken by defendants. Early in November 1961, he purchased a water softener for his home which was manufactured, sold and installed by defendants. The installation was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. State v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Rickards v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  4. Elois N. Sahuc v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Kelly v. Lowney & Williams, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Buckley v. Trenton Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API