Legal Opinion

In re Wilder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by Martha A. Smith and others from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Onondaga Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Lewis on the llth day of August, 1903, appointing commissioners to assess damages to riparian owners on Deer river.

1Opinion of the Court

Spring, J.:

The respondents presented their petition to the Supreme Court asking for the appointment of commissioners to assess the damages of certain riparian owners along Deer river and its tributaries, in pursuance of chapter 565 of the Laws of 1903, and the order appealed from appointing such commissioners was granted.

The act upon which the proceeding was based is entitled: “ An Act declaring Deer River, and its tributaries, in the Towns of Montague, Pinckney and Denmark, in the county of Lewis, a public highway, and providing for the assessment and payment of damages to riparian owners…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex parte JenningsNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  2. Matter of BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Brewster v. J. & J. Rogers Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. De Camp v. ThomsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. In re ThomsonNew York Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brant Lake Shores, Inc. v. BartonNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API