Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Whitlock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 2013PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

The Commonwealth challenges the trial court’s July 15, 2011 suppression order. That order precluded the introduction into evidence of five bricks of heroin retrieved from a five-gallon bucket located on the front porch of the residence of Jerrell Whitlock (“Appellee”). We affirm.

The trial court has provided the following account of the facts and allegations underlying its suppression ruling:

Pittsburgh Police officers, including Officer Fetty, Officer Rosato and Officer Butler were patrolling the Hazelwood area of the City of Pittsburgh [in plain clothes] in an unmarked…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IvySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Com. v. Heidelberg, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. HudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API