Legal Opinion

LaGrand Steel Products Co. v. A.S.C. Constructors, Inc.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1985No. 14879PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented is whether, under the facts of this case, a supplier of material to a public works project is entitled to recover against the prime contractor’s payment bond. The district court said no. We reverse.

A.S.C. Constructors, Inc., was awarded the prime contract for construction of the Boise State University multi-purpose pavilion. As required by I.C. § 54-1926, A.S.C. obtained a payment bond, purchasing it from Travelers Indemnity Company. A.S.C. contracted with Steel Management, Inc., to provide fabricated steel for the project. Steel Management, in turn, contracted with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Burley v. McCaslin Lumber Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Acoustic Specialties, Inc. v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Farwest Steel Corp. v. Mainline Metal Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  2. L & W SUPPLY CORP. v. Chartrand Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Western Metal Lath v. Acoustical & Construction Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Young v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Vulcraft v. Midtown Business Park, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API