Legal Opinion
State v. Connors
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 2, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] The State of Maine appeals from an order entered in the District Court (Fort Kent, Daigle, J.) suppressing evidence obtained from an investigatory stop of vehicles operated by Roland D. Connors and Jake A. Harvey. The State contends that the stops were based on reasonable articu-lable suspicion and accordingly the court erred by granting the motion to suppress. We agree and vacate the judgment.
[¶ 2] The facts are essentially undisputed. The North Maine Woods (N.M.W.) acts as an agent for various landowners. In Township 16, Range Nine, W.E.L.S., at Third Pelletier Brook Lake, it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State v. CusackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State v. RizzoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GulickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- State v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- State v. EklundSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- State v. Michael M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001