Legal Opinion

Wells v. . Wells

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PetitioN to rehear.

1Opinion of the Court

ClaRK, 0. J.

This is a petition to rehear this case, decided 156 N. C., 246. W. D. Wells, deceased, left surviving a'widow, who, it is admitted, is 'entitled to one-half the personal estate, and his mother, who claims to be entitled to the other half. Revisal, 132 (3), provides: “If there be no child nor legal representatives of a deceased child, then half the estate shall be allotted to the widow, and the residue be distributed to every of the next of kin of the intestate who are in equal degree and to- those who legally represent them.”

The intestate left no children, and besides his mother…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Gillespie v. . FoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
  3. Wells v. . WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. AnonymousSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1798

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parker v. . PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Parsons v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Floyd v. Atlantnc Coast Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. In Re Estate of PrudenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. AnonymousSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1798

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API