Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Putnam County National Bank of Carmel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 22, 1998No. 97 CIV. 6403(BDP)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
PARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Simpson asserts claims against defendants Putnam County National Bank of Carmel (the “Bank”), Ryder Trust, Wayne Ryder, John A. Porco P.C., John A. Porco, Curtiss Leibell & Shilling, P.C. (“Cur-tiss Leibell”), and William Shilling, under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C.1961 et seq., and under state law for fraud, tortious interference with contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract, and civil conspiracy.
The Bank, Ryder Trust, Wayne Ryder, John…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan ServicingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- In re Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Reisner v. StollerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Figueroa v. Merscorp, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Fontana Empire Center, LLC v. City of FontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.