Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 29, 1998No. 93-73601PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING LONDON INSURERS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE “EXPECTED OR INTENDED” CLAUSE WITH RESPECT TO THE CONALCO SITE
EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This matter came before the court at a hearing on August 17, 1997, on London Insurers’ 1 motion for summary judgment with respect to the Conalco site, incorporating by reference the motion for summary judgment regarding the absence of any “occurrence” at the Conalco site filed by Travelers. 2 For the reasons more particularly set forth below, there is a genuine issue of material fact whether Dow’s officers or directors…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- PSI Energy, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999