Hughes v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

In this appeal, Claimant1 by supplemental brief, contends that he was not advised of the rights afforded to him under 34 Pa. Code §101.21(a).2 Our review of the record indicates that the Claimant was not represented by counsel at the referee’s hearing and that he was not advised of his rights.

*65In Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427, 430 A.2d 354 (1981) we held that, where the claimant complained that the referee failed to advise her as an nnconnseled claimant of her procedural rights, the case would be remanded. In Peda v.…