Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2270 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

In this unemployment compensation appeal, the claimant, by supplemental brief, contends that the referee did not advise her of her right to have counsel and to cross-examine adverse witnesses, as is required, Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427, 430 A.2d 354 (1981), 34 Pa. Code §101.21 (a). Review of the hearing record confirms the factual correctness of that assertion. We have held that a claimant can raise this issue on appeal. Hughes v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 67, 445 A.2d 1352…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Katz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Snow v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Kusnir v. LEACHCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Peda v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Linke v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barksdale v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API