Ruberoid Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
When this appeal was first decided, our mandate was “Order affirmed; enforcement granted.” Petitioner now seeks to have us amend our mandate 'by striking therefrom any reference to enforcement. In the original appeal, petitioner sought, as provided by 15 U.S.C.A. § 21, to have us modify an order of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) by limiting its scope and by inserting therein certain defenses provided by the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 12 et seq. The order, based upon violations of the Clayton Act, supra, had been entered after a hearing at which petitioner introduced no…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. BalmeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Federal Trade Commission v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
3Cited by11 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Texaco Inc. v. HasbrouckSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- E. Edelmann & Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Motor Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.