Legal Opinion

Ruberoid Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 14, 1951No. 149, Docket 21667PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

When this appeal was first decided, our mandate was “Order affirmed; enforcement granted.” Petitioner now seeks to have us amend our mandate 'by striking therefrom any reference to enforcement. In the original appeal, petitioner sought, as provided by 15 U.S.C.A. § 21, to have us modify an order of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) by limiting its scope and by inserting therein certain defenses provided by the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 12 et seq. The order, based upon violations of the Clayton Act, supra, had been entered after a hearing at which petitioner introduced no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. BalmeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Texaco Inc. v. HasbrouckSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. E. Edelmann & Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Motor Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API