Legal Opinion

Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Nevins

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1989No. 88-1560PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

881 F.2d 657

The HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian tribe

on its own behalf and on behalf of its enrolled members, and

Hoopa Valley Timber Corporation, a tribal enterprise of the

Hoopa Valley Tribe, Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants,

v.

Richard NEVINS, Conway H. Collin, Ernest J. Dronenburg,

William F. Bennett, and Kenneth Cory, as members of the

California State Board of Equalization; California State

Board of Equalization; and State of California,

Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Nos. 88-1560, 88-1662.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 8,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jones v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Romero v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Bishope Paiute Tribe v. County of InyoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Native Village of Venetie IRA Council v. AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Riverside CountyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API