Legal Opinion

Bishope Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 4, 2002No. 01-15007PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

On March 23, 2000, the District Attorney for the County of Inyo (“District Attorney”) and the Sheriff for the County of Inyo (“Sheriff’) obtained and executed a warrant to search Bishop Paiute Gaming Corporation (“Corporation”) employee records held in the possession and control of the Bishop Paiute Tribe (“Tribe”) in Bishop, California, as part of a welfare fraud investigation. The Tribe and the Corporation brought suit against the County of Inyo (“County”), the District Attorney, and the Sheriff (collectively “Defendants”) under federal and state law seeking…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moreno Avalos Cortez Mauricio Robert Avalos Terry Leach Lydia Avalos Guillermo Avalos Kathy Granillo v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Richard Ceballos v. Gil Garcetti Frank Sundstedt Carol Najera County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Narragansett Indian v. State of Rhode IslanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  4. Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Village of Union SpringsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API