Legal Opinion

State v. Lombardo

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1982No. 130A81Published

1Opinion of the Court

295 S.E.2d 399 (1982)

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Dennis LOMBARDO.

No. 130A81.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 1982.

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Frank P. Graham, Raleigh, for the State.

Herman E. Gaskins, Washington, and Joel Hirschhorn, Miami, Fla., admitted pro hac vice, for defendant-appellant.

CARLTON, Justice.

I

A

In light of our holding below that the exclusionary rule is not applicable in probation revocation hearings, an extensive recitation of the facts in this case is unnecessary. However, in order to address the erroneous reasoning of the Court of Appeals, we…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API