Lee v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant originally filed his statement of errors covering two points, namely: (1) Error claimed in the admission of testimony respecting the finding of unpaid bills at the home of appellant, and (2) error in denying a new trial. After the statement of proceedings and evidence had been approved by the trial court, new counsel appeared in the case and obtained from this court permission to file a supplemental statement of errors. The supplemental statement contained the following errors: (1) The verdict is contrary to the evidence, and (2) the verdict is contrary to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Agar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. MoyerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Dimmick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
- Bridges v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Masters v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Watwood v. Potomac Chemical Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Packard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Hoover v. BabcockDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- James v. GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947