Legal Opinion

Kish v. Bakaysa

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1938No. Appeal, 40PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This appeal is the result of the refusal of the court below to submit an issue devisavit vel non to the jury. The learned chancellor, after hearing all of the contestants’ testimony, amounting to more than 400 pages of the printed record, concluded it lacked probative force and was legally inadequate to sustain a verdict against the validity of the will. He gave peremptory instructions to the jury to answer affirmatively, that the testator was of sound mind and memory, and that the will was not procured by the exercise of undue influence. Motions for a new trial and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Phillips' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Tetlow's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Lawrence's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Wilson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  5. Brennan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Noble's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Taylor v. AviSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Estate of StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Dulnikowski v. StanzianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. In Re Estate of AngierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API